search
**This is an old revision of the document!**
Papers with Interesting Ideas that We Might Be Able to Use
- RoboJockey with timing on a cyclic clock.
These are some papers that have heavily influenced how I think about the world. – Mike G.<br/> (1) Ironies of Automation: http://www.ida.liu.se/~HKGD35/info/Ironies%20of%20Automation.pdf<br/> (2) A Theoretical Field Analysis of Automobile Driving<br/> (3) Heuristics, Rules of Thumb, and the 80/20 Proposition<br/> (4) Invariants of Human Behavior<br/> (5) A New Defense of Satisficing<br/> (6) The Enterprise of Knowledge<br/> (7) Judgments Under Uncertainty http://psiexp.ss.uci.edu/research/teaching/Tversky_Kahneman_1974.pdf<br/> (8) Intelligence without representation http://people.csail.mit.edu/brooks/papers/representation.pdf<br/> (9) Ecological Interface Design: Theoretical Foundations. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=156574&isnumber=4054 <br/> (10) Naturalistic Decision-Making: Where are We Now? Pages 1-16 from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mwR8YA3QPwcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&ots=YSxkZSfJdo&sig=rMkKzuxbcuGLNsdkXmeJfZ9E2y8#PPA16,M1<br/>
Papers that might make it on the above list
- A Chapter from Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart<br/>
- A Chapter from Simon's “Science of the Artificial”<br/>
- Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making. Why remembering numbers may make us more likely to break our diet. http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~mike/mikeg/papers/FruitOrCakeUnderMemorySeminalPaper_annotated.pdf Mike's annotated version of this paper]. Do not distribute, but rather refer people to the version on JSTOR. * [http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~mike/mikeg/papers/CakeVersusSaladUnderMemory.pdf Feeling and Thinking in Memory-BAsed versus Stimulus-Based Choices]. A follow-on to the previous paper. * [[http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~mike/mikeg/papers/CollectiveIntelligence_annotated.pdf Mike's annotated version of a paper] that discusses a measure of group intelligence, shows that group intelligence is real but not correlated with the intelligence of individuals within the group, and identifies some things that are correlated with group intelligence (like not having a domineering personality or having women in the group). '''''Other papers that we've discussed as a lab''''' * [[Media:KnudsenLevinthal07.pdf
- Validating HRI Schemes in Multitasking Environments. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1453692<br/>
