CCASH: Cost-Conscious Annotation Supervised by Humans
See CCASH Setup for instructions on how to setup CCASH for development.
Versions
0.1 - Demoed in the ALFA meeting on 10 Dec 08
Goals
Components
Dictionary/Lexicon
Experimental Variables
Dictionary v. no dictionary
Sentence v. word v. other granularity
Waiting: human or machine
Modes of keyboard interaction
Dictionary: building from scratch or pre-formed
Scope of annotation: project vs. document
Feature Set Pool
This is the wishlist of features we will use to create version 0.2's target feature set. Right now this is a fluid pool. Please add things. We can decide which features stay in future meetings.
High Priority
projects created
complete work flow for a document: it may be assigned to a user, annotated, reviewed, and marked complete.
user administration panel: create, assign roles, delete
project admininstration panel: create, assign to users, delete
link to dictionary entries in the annotation lens
create new dictionary entries from words during the annotation process
deal gracefully with English's tagset (single category, 45 possible values)
No Assigned Priority…yet
active reviewing - just seeing conflicts not everything?
token correction - by reviewer or annotator, token was input incorrectly into database, etc.
annotator comments to reviewer - about documents, tokens, any granularity
annotation color codes - yellow=computer, blue=human, green=reviewed/approved, red=problem
subversion style annotating - each annotation is a revision/multiple annotations per word
change database engine to innodb
Back to top